- November 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (2)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (1)
- November 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (2)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (2)
- June 2014 (3)
- May 2014 (1)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (3)
- September 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (1)
- July 2013 (2)
- June 2013 (2)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (1)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (2)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (3)
- 3D7 IC50 Avery Lab (3)
- AstraZeneca (2)
- MetID (3)
- Potencies GSK (1)
- Potencies Guy (1)
- Syngene (8)
- UCSD (1)
- Biology (37)
- DMPK (2)
- Dundee (4)
- GSH-EE - Chapman Lab (2)
- GSK PRR Assay (1)
- Imperial DGFA (1)
- Kirk Lab (5)
- Metabolism (1)
Biological evaluation of OSM-S-106 through 116 (excluding OSM-S-107) performed in Vicky Avery's lab by Sabine Fletcher.
The compounds look good in this round - all but cpd OSM-S-113 show activity.
I already ran the cytotoxicity as well, and none of the compounds was particularly cytotoxic (see 'summary report' file and curves in PDF).
Solubility: minor floating specks after dissolving in OSM-S-106; all others fine
Unfortunately I made a minor mistake: I started the Artemisinin CRC curve at the wrong concentration, 40 uM (same concentration as the compounds) as opposed to the usual 2 uM. The IC50 value obtained for the control is correct (4 nM), just the x-axis range of the curve is different compared to the previous runs. Sorry for that!
Displacement Curves
Strings
ID | InChI | 3D7 IC50 (nM) |
OSM-S-106 | InChI=1S/C12H10N4O2S2/c13-12-11-9(15-6-16-12)5-10(19-11)7-2-1-3-8(4-7)20(14,17)18/h1-6H,(H2,13,15,16)(H2,14,17,18) | 36 |
OSM-S-108 | InChI=1S/C16H15N3OS/c1-10-8-12(11(2)17-10)9-14-15(20)19-16(21-14)18-13-6-4-3-5-7-13/h3-9,17H,1-2H3,(H,18,19,20)/b14-9- | 1200 |
OSM-S-109 | InChI=1S/C22H18N4O3S/c1-14-12-16(15(2)25(14)18-8-10-19(11-9-18)26(28)29)13-20-21(27)24-22(30-20)23-17-6-4-3-5-7-17/h3-13H,1-2H3,(H,23,24,27)/b20-13- | 262 |
OSM-S-110 | InChI=1S/C22H18N4O4S/c1-13-10-15(14(2)25(13)17-6-8-18(9-7-17)26(29)30)11-20-21(28)24-22(31-20)23-16-4-3-5-19(27)12-16/h3-12,27H,1-2H3,(H,23,24,28)/b20-11- | 2300 |
OSM-S-111 | InChI=1S/C23H21N3O2S/c1-15-13-17(16(2)26(15)19-9-11-20(28-3)12-10-19)14-21-22(27)25-23(29-21)24-18-7-5-4-6-8-18/h4-14H,1-3H3,(H,24,25,27)/b21-14- | 146 |
OSM-S-112 |
InChI=1S/C23H21N3O3S/c1-14-11-16(15(2)26(14)18-7-9-20(29-3)10-8-18)12-21-22(28)25-23(30-21)24-17-5-4-6-19(27)13-17/h4-13,27H,1-3H3,(H,24,25,28)/b21-12- |
1600 |
OSM-S-113 | InChI=1S/C21H18N4O2S/c1-13-11-15(14(2)25(13)19-5-3-4-10-22-19)12-18-20(27)24-21(28-18)23-16-6-8-17(26)9-7-16/h3-12,26H,1-2H3,(H,23,24,27)/b18-12- | >40,000 |
OSM-S-114 |
InChI=1S/C22H19N3O2S/c1-14-11-16(15(2)25(14)18-8-4-3-5-9-18)12-20-21(27)24-22(28-20)23-17-7-6-10-19(26)13-17/h3-13,26H,1-2H3,(H,23,24,27)/b20-12- |
1200 |
OSM-S-115 |
InChI=1S/C22H19N3O2S/c1-14-12-16(15(2)25(14)18-6-4-3-5-7-18)13-20-21(27)24-22(28-20)23-17-8-10-19(26)11-9-17/h3-13,26H,1-2H3,(H,23,24,27)/b20-13- |
1800 |
OSM-S-35 | InChI=1S/C22H19N3OS/c1-15-13-17(16(2)25(15)19-11-7-4-8-12-19)14-20-21(26)24-22(27-20)23-18-9-5-3-6-10-18/h3-14H,1-2H3,(H,23,24,26)/b20-14- | 38 |
OSM-S-116 | InChI=1S/C16H17FN2O3/c1-9-8-14(16(21)22-11(3)15(18)20)10(2)19(9)13-6-4-12(17)5-7-13/h4-8,11H,1-3H3,(H2,18,20) | 11000 |
Glutathione Trapping Study for OSM-S-35
Results
Conclusion
We’ve run the glutathione trapping study for OSM-S-35 in the presence of metabolic activation (i.e. human microsomes). We also included a search for other potential metabolites formed. A number of metabolites were detected, mainly oxygenated species (mono, bis and tri-oxygenated metabolites) with the predominant metabolite (based on peak area and assuming similar response factors for each metabolite) arising from likely hydroxylation of the pyrrole substituted benzene. In the presence of GSH-EE, adducts were observed both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The results are summarised in the attached file. Please let me or Sue know if you have any questions or comments